Is the AMOLED Worth It?

AMOLED delivers an appealing experience from visual to performance. Therefore, its mainstream application market is where consumers pursue more extreme performance and are willing to pay a higher price for a better experience.

What is AMOLED?

OLED

AMOLED

OLED vs.AMOLED

FeatureOLEDAMOLED
Pixel ControlPassive MatrixActive Matrix
ResolutionModerateHigh
Refresh RateLowerHigher
Power EfficiencyLowerHigher (dynamic pixel control)
ApplicationsEntry-level or small devicesPremium devices and innovations
Table 1. OLED vs. AMOLED

Application Upgrade: IPS LCD to AMOLED

IPS LCD vs AMOLED Watch
Figure 1. IPS LCD vs. AMOLED

Why Upgrade?

High Contrast and Wide Color Gamut

1.75 inch AMOLED vs 1.85 inch TFT LCD
Figure 2. 1.75″ AMOLED vs. 1.85″ TFT LCD

Thin and Flexible Design

Energy Efficiency

Wide Viewing Angles

Fast Response Time

FeatureIPS LCDAMOLED
TechnologyUses a backlight to illuminate liquid crystals and polarizers to display images.Uses self-emissive organic diodes where each pixel generates its own light.
Black LevelsCannot achieve true black due to the constant backlight.Capable of true black as individual pixels can turn off completely.
Contrast RatioModerate contrast ratio due to backlighting.Infinite contrast ratio as a result of self-emissive pixels.
ThicknessThicker and heavier due to the backlight layer.Thinner and lighter as no backlight is needed.
Power ConsumptionHigher power usage as the backlight remains on even for black pixels.Lower power usage, especially for darker images, as black pixels consume no energy.
Viewing AnglesGood, but colors may wash out slightly at extreme angles.Excellent with minimal color shifting at any angle.
BrightnessGenerally brighter, better suited for outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.Slightly less bright but improving with advancements in technology.
LifespanLonger lifespan as it does not degrade as quickly over time.Shorter lifespan due to organic materials degrading over time (e.g., blue pixel aging).
CostMore affordable due to mature production techniques and widespread adoption.Higher production costs, though decreasing with advancements in technology.
ApplicationsCommon in monitors, TVs, and budget smartphones.Used in premium smartphones, smartwatches, and devices requiring superior visual quality.
Table 2. IPS LCD vs. AMOLED

Application Areas: What Terminal Are AMOLEDs Mainly Used for?

AMOLED delivers an appealing experience from visual to performance. Therefore, its mainstream application market is where consumers pursue more extreme performance and are willing to pay a higher price for a better experience. 

Smartwatches

AMOLED provides superior outdoor readability and vibrant colors, even under direct sunlight. 

Such as Garmin has embraced AMOLED displays in its premium sports watches, which offer better contrast and power efficiency compared to IPS LCD.

Smartphones (OLED Phones)

Smartphones with AMOLED screens, such as Samsung Galaxy and iPhones, deliver unparalleled visual experiences.

Features like deep blacks and vivid colors enhance multimedia consumption and gaming.

Flexible and Foldable Devices

Due to its inherent flexibility, AMOLED is a preferred choice for foldable smartphones, rollable TVs, and innovative product designs that require bending or curving displays.

Like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold, showcases AMOLED’s adaptability to curved and flexible designs.

Laptops and Notebooks

Some premium ultrabooks and gaming laptops include AMOLED panels to provide rich color reproduction and immersive visual experiences for professionals and gamers.

Hesitation

Of course, some people may wonder whether it is costly to upgrade to AMOLED.

The cost of AMOLED is higher than that of traditional IPS LCD, mainly because of its complex production process and low yield, especially for high-resolution and small-pixel pitch displays. In contrast, the traditional LCD process is very mature and the production cost is relatively low.

However, with the gradual maturity of AMOLED technology and the expansion of production scale, manufacturers have invested more resources in manufacturing, testing, and filtering, thereby improving the yield rate. 

Now the production line of small-size AMOLEDs, such as 1.43-inch and 1.75-inch round AMOLEDs, has lowered the cost of mass production compared to previous years. Their price is affordable and compared with related-size TFT LCDs. 

For applications demanding high visual fidelity, slim form factors, and energy efficiency, AMOLED is worthy.

For everyday devices where cost efficiency is a key factor, IPS LCD or traditional OLED is sufficient. 

Any questions or requirements on the AMOLED displays, contact us for further discussion.

The related articles you may interested in:

Share this article